Building an AI-Powered Bug Tracking System
## The Problem: Bugs in Production
When you are running a production web application, errors happen. Users encounter 404 pages, CSRF validation fails, servers throw 500 errors. Traditionally, developers only discover these bugs when:
1. A user reports it (if they bother)
2. You happen to check the logs
3. Something catastrophic breaks
What if bugs could automatically find you instead?
## Introducing Automated Bug Tracking
I built a Django app called error_tracking that creates a complete bug lifecycle:
Production Error -> Django Middleware -> Database Log -> Celery Task
|
Creates GitHub Issue
Creates B-XXX.md file
|
Claude Session -> Queries open bugs -> Fixes with TDD -> Human verifies
### How It Works
**1. Error Capture Middleware**
Every HTTP 4xx/5xx response is intercepted by custom middleware that logs it to the database.
**2. Fingerprinting**
Similar errors are grouped using a fingerprint hash based on error type, status code, and normalized URL pattern. This means hitting /api/pets/1/ and /api/pets/999/ with a 404 creates ONE bug, not two.
**3. Automatic Bug Creation**
When a new fingerprint is detected, a Celery task creates a B-XXX.md file and opens a GitHub issue with the bug label.
**4. Claude Fixes Bugs Proactively**
I created a /bugs skill that Claude Code can run at the start of any session to query GitHub for open bugs, then fix them using TDD.
## Results
After deploying this to petfriendlyvet.com:
- 45 tests with 97% coverage
- Errors are captured in real-time
- Bug files are auto-generated
- GitHub issues track everything
- Claude can fix bugs without me asking
## Why This Matters
This is AI-native development - designing systems where AI agents can participate autonomously. The AI does not wait to be told about problems. It discovers them, proposes solutions, and implements fixes - with human oversight at the verification step.
The key insight: make bugs flow to the AI, not the other way around.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!